Tuesday, March 05, 2024
Outlook.com
Outlook India
Outlook Business

Federal Reserve To Review Its Supervision of Silicon Valley Bank

Regulators closed the Silicon Valley Bank on Friday after depositors rushed to withdraw their funds all at once. The only larger failure in U.S. banking history was the 2008 collapse of Washington Mutual

Federal Reserve To Review Its Supervision of Silicon Valley Bank
The Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building
www.federalreserve.gov

Press Trust Of India

POSTED ON March 14, 2023 11:31 AM

The Federal Reserve will review its supervision of Silicon Valley Bank after it collapsed in the second-largest US bank failure on record, the Fed announced Monday.

 Michael Barr, the Fed's vice chair for supervision, will lead the effort, the Fed said in a brief statement.

Chair Jerome Powell said the central bank would conduct a “thorough, transparent and swift review.”

In a statement, Barr said: “We need to have humility and conduct a careful and thorough review of how we supervised and regulated this firm and what we should learn from this experience.”

Depositors withdrew savings and investors broadly sold off bank shares Monday as the federal government raced to reassure Americans that the banking system was secure after two bank failures fed fears that more financial institutions could fall.

President Joe Biden insisted that the system was safe after the second-and third-largest bank failures in the nation's history happened in the span of 48 hours. In response to the crisis, regulators guaranteed all deposits at the two banks and created a program that effectively thews a lifeline to other banks to shield them from a run on deposits.

“Your deposits will be there when you need them,” Biden told the public, seeking to project calm. He also said the banking executives responsible for the failures would be held accountable.

Regulators closed the Silicon Valley Bank on Friday after depositors rushed to withdraw their funds all at once. The only larger failure in U.S. banking history was the 2008 collapse of Washington Mutual. New York-based Signature Bank also collapsed in the third-largest failure in the U.S.

In both cases, the government agreed to cover deposits, even those that exceeded the federally insured limit of $250,000.

Despite the message from the White House, investors broadly dumped shares in bank stocks. Shares of First Republic Bank plunged more than 70 per cent even after the bank said it was taking emergency funding from the Federal Reserve and additional money from JP Morgan Chase.

First Republic wasn't alone. Shares of well-known franchises like Charles Schwab, Fifth Third Bank, Truist, Comercia and Ally Financial all fell sharply.

The selloff happened in part because the country woke up to a new banking system and investors had to find the winners and losers, banking experts said.

There was no guarantee that the anxiety would not spread. Customers at other banks with deposits over the $250,000 limit remained at risk of losing access to their money for a time.

Just because the government covered Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank "doesn't mean they are going to cover for these smaller banks,” said Chris Caulfield, a senior partner at West Monroe.

But the government's actions suggested it would stand behind all deposits if doing so prevents damage to the broader economy.

“Everything is now covered. That's a fact. No matter how specialized or isolated your bank is, if there's a risk of contagion, regulators have made it clear that they are going to intervene,” said Norbert Michel, a banking policy expert at the libertarian-leaning Cato Institute. 

Ian Brandt, who had an account at Signature Bank, visited a branch in New York City down the street from the law firm where he is an attorney. After being unable to reach someone by phone, he walked to the bank to see if it was open.

Asked if he felt any assurance after the bank's deposits were secured by the government, Brandt said, “For the moment.”

Amid the selloff of midsize banks, investors kept relatively calm over the health of the nation's biggest banking bulwarks, such as JP Morgan Chase, Citi Group, Bank of America and Wells Fargo. Investors apparently concluded that the only place to be safe in banking was with the nation's most strictly regulated institutions.

Regional banks were seen as the riskiest since they do not have the scale to compete against larger competitors. Large account balances — once seen as a positive sign that a bank's clients are well off — were a liability since they could be withdrawn at the first sign of trouble.

"I wouldn't want to be running a regional bank right now where my services are no different from my competition,” Caulfield said.

International regulators also had to step in to ease fears. The Bank of England and U.K. Treasury said they facilitated the sale of a Silicon Valley Bank subsidiary in London to HSBC, Europe's biggest bank. The deal protected 6.7 billion pounds ($8.1 billion) of deposits.

Under the plan announced by U.S. regulators, depositors at Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank were able to access their money. A new Fed program will allow banks to post those securities as collateral and borrow from the emergency facility.

The Treasury has set aside $25 billion to offset any losses. However, Fed officials said they do not expect to have to use that money, given that the securities posted as collateral have a very low risk of default.

New York bank regulators took possession of Signature Bank on Sunday, ousting its leaders and handing day-to-day control over to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

New York Governmnet Kathy Hochul said the decision by the state Department of Financial Services was aimed at holding off a bigger crisis involving more banks.

“Our view was to make sure that the entire banking community here in New York was stable, that we can project calm,” Hochul said Monday at a news conference.

  • Related Articles

    Chandrasekhar mentioned that start-ups are important in the Indian economy

    Rajeev Chandrasekhar To Meet Indian Start-Ups To Discuss SVB Debacle

    Taking the issue to Twitter, Grover said that VCs are not the founders of companies and they do not deploy their own money to the start-ups

    SVB Debacle: Ashneer Grover Is Eager To See VCs Losing Jobs

    According to a report by Moneycontrol, more than 60 per cent of the YCombinator-backed Indian start-ups deposited over $2,50,000 in SVB

    YCombinator-Backed Indian Start-Ups Find Themselves In Trouble Due To The SVB Collapse: Report